Previous Article / Next Article

IMPACT

Consumer-Directed Community Supports: A County Perspective on a New Service Option

By Jerry Mellum and Kate Heffernan

Consumer-directed community supports (CDCS) is a service option offered in Minnesota through the Home and Community-Based Services Waiver for Persons with Mental Retardation and Related Conditions (HCBS/MRRC). Hennepin County, which includes the Minneapolis metropolitan area, was one of the first counties in the state to partner with the Minnesota Department of Human Services to offer CDCS. This service option can be described as:

Hennepin County’s involvement in CDCS for persons with mental retardation and related conditions began following a heavily attended 1997 community forum called New Values, New Visions (Hennepin County, 1997). Feedback at this forum, as well as in subsequent focus groups with community members, indicated that county residents wanted more flexible, consumer-driven supports that offered people more choice and control over their supports and services. This vision propelled the County to enter into a Memorandum of Understanding with the Minnesota Department of Human Services in 1999 to offer CDCS.

The County is now a nationwide leader in the provision of CDCS. Currently, 43% (1346) of the people who receive HCBS/MRRC in the county use CDCS. Slightly more than half of these recipients are under the age of 18, with the average age at 19, and most CDCS recipients live at home with their families. In part due to how well it has been received in Hennepin County, the consumer-directed option is being expanded statewide for persons with mental retardation and related conditions as well as to other persons with disabilities.

How and Why Hennepin County Committed to CDCS

Hennepin County had been moving toward a commitment to self-determination and individually-controlled budgets for many years before CDCS became an option under the HCBS/MRRC program. In a variety of ways, it had worked toward shifting the roles and responsibilities of waiver recipients and social services staff. For example, from 1997 to 2000 the County worked closely with three other Minnesota counties (Dakota, Olmsted and Blue Earth) on creating more person-centered and consumer-directed services as part of the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation Self-Determination Project. Along with them, Hennepin County participated in national and local conferences and training events regarding self-determination. As part of its commitment the County hired personnel specifically assigned to the development of a model for individually-controlled budgets. Supporting this commitment and easing the process were internal champions and a community advisory group committed to making self-determination and increased control a reality for people and their families in Hennepin County.

There have also been several pressing problems that helped move the County and its service recipients toward CDCS. As in many places throughout the United States there had been a significant staffing crisis in this area. Traditional service providers often simply could not find and keep enough approved staff to meet the needs of the people to whom they were currently providing services. The reluctance of existing service providers to expand, coupled with a large waiting list of families and individuals needing services, resulted in a significant staffing crisis in the 1990s. CDCS has been an option to resolve this crisis by allowing families greater flexibility and direct participation in the staff recruitment and hiring process. This flexibility and direct participation has offered an opportunity to expand the pool of service providers to individuals who may not have otherwise provided services to individuals with disabilities in the county.

How CDCS Works

Under the CDCS option, Hennepin County’s role in the life of the individual receiving services has shifted from that of purchaser of services to more of a support function (see Figure 1 describing the roles of various stakeholders). However, the County retains some basic accountability related to assuring quality and equity. Although the program is consumer-directed, there are some components for which state and federal regulations require the County to be responsible. Additionally, the County retains administrative responsibilities that exist under the HCBS/MRRC program, such as determining eligibility and managing the overall waiver budget. The Memorandum of Understanding between the State and Hennepin County highlights a number of areas for which the local County agency is responsible. Examples include:

CDCS has been a remarkable option with many positive outcomes for individuals and families, including:

Remaining Challenges

While Hennepin County has done remarkably well in moving into the CDCS option for people with mental retardation and related conditions and their families, it has not been a totally smooth transition. The shift in roles has meant that both the County and people receiving services and their families have faced a learning curve during the last several years. Many challenges have popped up along the way and many remain as the County moves forward with improving CDCS. When the concept of individually-controlled budgets and increased consumer choice and control was initially presented to County staff, there were concerns. A great deal of effort was put into researching models and establishing consistent procedures and guidelines. In this process, the County partnered with stakeholders invested in self-determination, and co-sponsored a Self-Determination Advisory Committee with Arc Hennepin/Carver. This group was comprised of service recipients, family members, service providers, advocates and County personnel and was organized around the principles of self-determination in all aspects of life. The group has been especially active and instrumental in contributions made to the CDCS program in Hennepin County. The County has also collaborated closely with other counties as a means to establish consistency in the program.

Due to the rapid expansion of the CDCS option in Hennepin County, the County has at times needed to backtrack to build more effective systems of support and monitoring for the already-operating program. Certainly a slower paced growth of CDCS would often be preferable in implementing individually-controlled options.

Additional challenges have arisen when state government has adjusted funding that the County receives. In such situations, the County has had to struggle with how to allocate resources and resource reductions equitably.

Hennepin County continues to struggle with decisions regarding individual situations, including when people can and cannot continue on CDCS, and the need to balance standardization of allowable expenses and options under CDCS with the promise of flexibility and “freedom” in buying one’s own services. It remains a challenge to define and refine the role of the County with respect to monitoring, quality assurance, and fraud investigations. County personnel who have previously been decision-makers and in the role of gatekeeping and monitoring have had to change their ways of thinking. CDCS has provided opportunities for much discussion and education for all stakeholders.

The Future of CDCS

As individuals with disabilities and their families using CDCS become more sophisticated, the case management role changes. Ideally, social work staff would be able to focus on people with greater or particular needs and on people with fewer natural supports, while those using CDCS function more independently. While CDCS offers many advantages for individuals and their families, Hennepin County, along with all stakeholders involved in CDCS, continues to identify and respond to issues that have not been faced in traditional service models. As consumer-directed options continue to expand across the state and country, it will be important for all stakeholders to learn from each other about effective ways to solve individual and administrative challenges.

References

Hennepin County Minnesota (1997). New values, new visions – Guidelines for public policy for Hennepin County residents with disabilities. Author.

Jerry Mellum is Senior Planning Analyst in the Hennepin County Children, Family and Adult Services Department, Minneapolis, Minnesota. He may be reached at 612/596-7094 or by e-mail at Jerry.Mellum@co.hennepin.mn.us. Kate Heffernan is Principal Planning Analyst with the department, and may be reached at 612/596-7398 or Kate.Heffernan@co.hennepin.mn.us.


Figure 1: Roles of Stakeholders in CDCS

Family / Person Receiving Services

County

Fiscal Intermediary

Support /Coordinator Agent  (if hired and as requested by the family)


Top

Previous Article / Next Article
__________

Retrieved from the Web site of the Institute on Community Integration, University of Minnesota (http://ici.umn.edu). Citation: Gaylord, V., Moseley, C., Lakin, C. & Hewitt, A. (Eds.) (2004). Impact: Feature Issue on Consumer-Controlled Budgets and Persons with Disabilities 17(1). Minneapolis: University of Minnesota, Institute on Community Integration. Available from http://ici.umn.edu/products/impact/171.

__________

Hard copies of Impact are available from the Publications Office of the Institute on Community Integration. The first copy of this issue is free; additional copies are $4 each. You can request copies by phone at 612-624-4512 or E-mail at icipub@umn.edu, or you can fax or mail us an order form. See our listing of other issues of Impact for more information.

The print design version (PDF, 776 K, 32 pp.) of this issue of Impact is also available for free, complete with the color layout and photographs. This version looks the most like the newsletter as it was printed.

College of Education and Human Development at the University of Minnesota

The University of Minnesota is an equal opportunity employer and educator.